Sample inputs
Sample working view
Claims12
Marked verified0
Needs review12
Deck formatEditable HTML
12 sample rows
| Slide / topic | Claim | Evidence location | Review status | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Problem | Repair studios reconcile component records across tools. | Interview notes required | draft | Founder |
| Customer | Independent repair studios are the initial audience. | Target-customer hypothesis | draft | Founder |
| Solution | One source-linked component register. | Local demo | draft | Engineering |
| Workflow | Import, review and export records. | Walkthrough recording needed | draft | Engineering |
| Product | A local demonstration exists. | Demo location | draft | Engineering |
| Alternatives | Manual spreadsheets are one alternative. | Competitor comparison required | draft | Founder |
| Differentiation | Review flags retain source context. | Test report needed | draft | Engineering |
| Market | Initial niche size remains to be researched. | No market-size evidence yet | blocked | Founder |
| Traction | No paid customer traction is claimed. | Sales log | draft | Founder |
| Economics | Pricing remains a hypothesis. | Interview and cost study needed | draft | Finance |
| Roadmap | A supervised export pilot is proposed. | Milestone plan | draft | Engineering |
| Discussion | Seek feedback on the import-review workflow. | Workshop agenda | draft | Founder |
Read the sample report
PITCH EVIDENCE BRIEF Example Circular Audience: Technical design partners One-line description: A fictional service helping repair studios track reusable components. 1. Problem Repair studios reconcile component records across tools. Evidence: Interview notes required Status: draft; owner: Founder 2. Customer Independent repair studios are the initial audience. Evidence: Target-customer hypothesis Status: draft; owner: Founder 3. Solution One source-linked component register. Evidence: Local demo Status: draft; owner: Engineering 4. Workflow Import, review and export records. Evidence: Walkthrough recording needed Status: draft; owner: Engineering 5. Product A local demonstration exists. Evidence: Demo location Status: draft; owner: Engineering 6. Alternatives Manual spreadsheets are one alternative. Evidence: Competitor comparison required Status: draft; owner: Founder 7. Differentiation Review flags retain source context. Evidence: Test report needed Status: draft; owner: Engineering 8. Market Initial niche size remains to be researched. Evidence: No market-size evidence yet Status: blocked; owner: Founder 9. Traction No paid customer traction is claimed. Evidence: Sales log Status: draft; owner: Founder 10. Economics Pricing remains a hypothesis. Evidence: Interview and cost study needed Status: draft; owner: Finance 11. Roadmap A supervised export pilot is proposed. Evidence: Milestone plan Status: draft; owner: Engineering 12. Discussion Seek feedback on the import-review workflow. Evidence: Workshop agenda Status: draft; owner: Founder Open questions: Which export schema matters first? Which output would save a reviewer time? “Verified” records an operator decision, not independent verification.
Do not present an evidence link as proof without checking it. No investment recommendation, valuation or funding outcome is implied.