Sample inputs
Sample working view
Top weighted scoreExample C
Score / 54.55
Criteria4
Weight total100
3 sample rows
| Vendor | Weighted score / 5 | Year-one listed cost | Evidence | Workflow fit | Data export | Support | Access controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example C | 4.55 | $420.00 | Security review pending | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Example A | 4.05 | $288.00 | Product documentation reviewed | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Example B | 3.4 | $316.00 | Trial notes | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
Read the sample report
VENDOR COMPARISON Decision: Select a project management tool Weights are normalized by their sum (100). Scores range from 0 to 5. Top weighted result: Example C. A tie does not establish preference. Year-one cost = 12 × monthly price + setup fee. Due diligence: verify security/access requirements, export formats, cancellation terms, support availability and current prices. Record a source for each rating. Repeat with alternative weights before selecting. Known constraints: Confirm export rights, seat counts and cancellation terms before purchase. A high score cannot override a mandatory security requirement.
Scores and prices are operator assumptions, not an independent vendor review. No payment, purchase or provider connection occurs.